I can’t write what I otherwise might given that O’Connor wrote the dissent in the two worst Supreme Court decisions of the last 100 years. All the blah-blah about her being a moderate or the fact that she might have had a bit too much regard for dubious precedent in Roe v. Wade is ultimately and easily trumped by the fact that she knew interstate commerce from growing a shrub in your backyard and private property rights from communal ownership. Even Scalia, whose philosophy I much prefer to her pragmatism, can’t claim that.

If Bush can find a nominee who has that much sense, it will raise the IQ of the Court if nothing else.

This entry was posted in Default.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: